Fear of public scrutiny

Posted by Unknown on 11:21 AM in Fear of public scrutiny, The clock struck nine | No comments

At the point when individuals from the pursuit board shaped by the president were at the presidential royal residence Bangabhaban to submit names of forthcoming race chiefs, the whole country was anxiously holding up to know whom the panel would propose as the following decision officials.

The inquiry board of trustees, which should present its rundown of names by 8 February, sat for its last meeting on 6 February to pick the planned decision chiefs. The general population felt that the advisory group may submit names on 7 February and the president would take a few days more to take a choice as to whom he would choose as the decision chiefs to lead the coming urgent races.

In any case, things began disentangling quick. The board presented its names on that very day of its last meeting. We, the newsmen, were holding up before the Bangabhaban door to see whether the board of trustees unveiled its proposed names subsequent to presenting the rundown to the president as they did in the last time, as requested by urban gatherings.

The bureau secretary, Shafiqul Alam, who was assuming the part of representative of the pursuit advisory group, developing out of Bangabhaban around 7:00 O'clock at night, revealed to us that he would brief newsmen at the bureau division at 9:00pm.

At that point we thought the board would uncover the proposed names at the preparation. Furthermore, we didn't know till then that a shock was sitting tight for us.

The clock struck nine, yet there were no indications of any media preparation and newsmen holding up at the bureau division got to be distinctly inquisitive with reference to whether the race officials would have been delegated on that very night. Furthermore, that is precisely what happened.

To absolute shock of a number of us, the decision magistrates were delegated with anomalous hurriedness on that very day and the declaration came at the instructions around 9:30pm, scarcely three hours inside the advisory group's accommodation of proposed names.

There was no impulse for the president to delegate the race magistrates so quickly. Indeed, even one of the 16 "recognized" subjects whom the hunt board of trustees counseled had approached the president to sit tight for maybe a couple months to select the ECs so that a law could be instituted by then.

One may review that the nation didn't have any race officials for three days after the abdication of the Aziz commission.

The general population, who are said to be the proprietors of the nation, had trusted that the names of proposed race magistrates would be unveiled in advance and some kind of feelings would be shaped, regardless of the possibility that in the media just, before the chiefs guaranteed to release their established obligations.

Political examiners, and even the nation's lawmakers, are frequently heard saying that majority rules system is not just holding a decision. It's about individuals' investment in running the state issues.

This time there was a shot for the general population to look at the individuals who would release their established obligations even before they were designated. In any case, lamentably, that didn't occur this time either.

The nation's senior subjects, decision specialists and political examiners had for quite some time been encouraging the experts worried to make open the names of the proposed race officials heretofore for open examination so that the nation sees no discussion over the race commission, by and by, after its development.

In any case, not to discuss the inquiry advisory group, no political gatherings even demonstrated enthusiasm for making open the names it proposed as their preferred decision chiefs to the pursuit board of trustees.

The decision Bangladesh Awami League general secretary, Obaidul Quader, rather approached the inquiry board to not distribute the names put together by the political gatherings.

Indeed, even restriction political gathering BNP which has no stage other than the media did not uncover its names, not even through "confidentially" implies.

After Quader's call, when newsmen asked the BNP pioneers whether they need the hunt advisory group to make open the rundowns put together by the political gatherings, they demonstrated their reservation.

The procedure of the two main foes here is the same. It likewise recommends the BNP would do the same had it been in the position of AL now.

Particularly, a little political gathering Bangladesher Samajtantrik Dal, otherwise known as BASAD, revealed its names to the media in spite of the fact that it doesn't have that much stake in Bangladesh's legislative issues.

The political gatherings periodically assert that they are in governmental issues for the nation and its kin. Assuming this is the case, what might not be right when they settled on open their choice, at any rate about the names of forthcoming race magistrates on this specific event?

Playing find the stowaway or, to put it gruffly, concealing something, especially in this circumstance, proposes something other than what's expected. It is for certain this covering up not the slightest bit will help enhance the procedure of individuals' strengthening; it will rather serve the interests of the political gatherings. Also, here the interests of the political gatherings mean either sticking to the state control or setting off to the state control.

Hosted the gatherings unveiled the names much before the arrangement of the race officials, the individuals from the general population would have the extension to examine their track records and after that would advance their recommendations to this end. They would likewise have the extension to see which political gatherings have recommended what kind of contender for managing decisions, the main method for individuals in Bangladesh to apply their will in the state undertakings.

A civil argument could happen between various partners in the general public including between the political gatherings which would in the long run help set up a sound political culture –truly majority rule standards.

One can state that these are strategies and technique of the political gatherings. Here is the issue. At the point when a political gathering runs its issues in light of a few systems and strategies and not on standards, it hones sick legislative issues, not governmental issues in the genuine feeling of the word.

Also, Bangladesh has been tormented by sick governmental issues, lamentably. What's more, it has been grave to the point that the general population think sick governmental issues is the standard.

We have to leave such sick governmental issues, need to leave the dread of open investigation to guarantee responsibility, to take Bangladesh forward.